← All posts
GradingJuly 12, 2026 · 9 min read · GrailHawk editorial

PSA grading levels explained (1–10 scale)

Every PSA grade from Poor to Gem Mint in plain language — what PSA 10 means, how 9 differs, and how to buy with grade filters.


PSA grades trading cards on a 1 to 10 scale. PSA 10 is Gem Mint — the top. Everything below is a step down in condition, and those steps change what a card is worth. This guide explains every PSA grading level in plain language so you can read a slab label, compare sold comps, and set the right price alert.

What does PSA 10 mean?

PSA 10 means Gem Mint. The card looks virtually perfect: sharp corners, clean edges, strong centering, and a surface that holds up under close inspection. Only a small share of submissions earn a 10, which is why PSA 10 prices often jump far above PSA 9 for the same card.

PSA grading levels 1–10 (full scale)

Use this chart as a collector's translation of the PSA scale — not a substitute for PSA's official standards. When you buy or sell, always compare the same grade to the same grade.

GradeLabelWhat collectors usually seeBuying tip
10Gem MintNear-perfect under close look; tiny flaws onlyCompare only other PSA 10s — never to a 9
9MintExcellent; one minor flaw you may need to hunt forOften the value 'sweet spot' vs Gem Mint premium
8NM-MTSlight wear: soft centering, light corner, or edgeCommon high-grade floor for many modern cards
7Near MintMinor handling; still clean for displayGood when a 9/10 premium is too steep
6EX-MTLight play wear; corners or surface show ageMatch photos carefully — 'EX' varies by seller
5ExcellentClear wear on corners, edges, or surfacePrice should reflect play, not mint comps
4VG-EXObvious wear; whitening or soft corners commonBuy for completion, not gem premiums
3Very GoodHeavy play; creases or surface loss possibleAvoid unless the card is ultra-scarce
2GoodMajor wear; structural issues often presentAuthenticate before paying for 'rare' low grades
1PoorSevere damage; last-resort collectible copyUsually memorabilia, not investment grade
PSA grading levels at a glance

What is the difference between PSA 9 and PSA 10?

Both look sharp in a photo. The difference is how close the card is to perfect under grading standards — and how scarce that top tier is. A PSA 9 is Mint. A PSA 10 is Gem Mint. For chase cards with low gem rates (Moonbreon, vintage Charizard), that one point can mean a large price gap because buyers concentrate on the few Gem Mint copies.

What graders check (centering, corners, edges, surface)

  • +Centering — how evenly the borders sit front and back.
  • +Corners — whitening, soft tips, or bends.
  • +Edges — chipping, whitening, or print issues along the rim.
  • +Surface — scratches, print lines, holo wear, stains, or clouding.

Any one weak factor can keep a card out of Gem Mint even if the other three look strong. That is why two cards that look similar online can grade a 9 and a 10.

How to use grading levels on GrailHawk

  1. 1Open the card's guide page and read live listings with grade filters in mind.
  2. 2Set a price alert with a grade filter (for example PSA 10) so you are not woken up for the wrong slab.
  3. 3Compare sold comps within the same grade — a cheap PSA 8 is not a PSA 10 deal.
  4. 4Track owned slabs in Portfolio with the grade filled in so value stays like-for-like.
Never mix grades in comps

Asking prices and sold comps are only useful when printing, language, and grade match. Mixing PSA 10 and raw (or PSA 8) creates fake deals.

PSA vs BGS vs CGC — same idea, different labels?

Other graders also use numeric scales, but labels and subgrades differ. PSA 10 is not automatically equal to a BGS 10 or CGC 10 in the market — collectors often pay different premiums by slab brand. When you set an alert, match the grader you actually want to buy.

Open on GrailHawkBrowse live graded listingsPick a card, filter by grade, and set a PSA-aware price alert.Continue →

Put it into practice

Set your target price and let GrailHawk watch eBay for the moment a listing drops into range.

Start a watch

Glossary · Editorial standards